We use cookies to enhance your experience on our website. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Find out more

Contents

Music In The Seventeenth And Eighteenth Centuries

CHAPTER 2 Fat Times and Lean

Organ Music from Frescobaldi to Scheidt; Schütz’s Career; Oratorio and Cantata

Chapter:
CHAPTER 2 Fat Times and Lean
Source:
MUSIC IN THE SEVENTEENTH AND EIGHTEENTH CENTURIES
Author(s):
Richard Taruskin

Richard Taruskin

SOME ORGANISTS

Whoever wrote it, and however it may have related to Monteverdi’s original design, the ending of L’incoronazione di Poppea was a harbinger. The seventeenth century was the great age of the ground bass. Infinitely extensible formal plans (if “plan” is indeed the word for something that is infinitely extensible) enabled musical compositions to achieve an amplitude comparable to the extravagantly majestic Counter Reformation church architecture that provided the spaces in which they were heard (and to which the word “baroque” was first applied).

These forms grew directly out of an oral or “improvisatory” practice that continued to flourish alongside its written specimens. The written examples, especially those meant for solo virtuosos to perform, represented the cream of the oral practice—particularly effective improvisations retained (as “keepers”) in memory for repeated performance and refinement and eventual commitment to paper, print, and posterity.

Chapter 2 Fat Times and Lean

fig. 2-1 Girolamo Frescobaldi, by Claude Mellan (1598–1688).

Chapter 2 Fat Times and Lean

fig. 2-2 Interior of St. Peter’s basilica, Rome, painted in 1730 by Giovanni Paolo Pannini (1692–1765).

That certainly seems to be the case with Girolamo Frescobaldi (1583–1643), the organist at St. Peter’s basilica in Rome from 1608 to his death, whose mature works were among the most distinctive embodiments of practices arising in the wake of the Counter Reformation. He was at once the most flamboyantly impressive keyboard composer of his time and the most characteristic, because it was characteristic of early seventeenth-century music to be flamboyantly impressive. The theatricalized quality that virtually all professional music making strove to project was as avidly cultivated by instrumentalists as by vocalists and those who wrote their material. The stock of the instrumental medium rose in consequence to the point where a major composer could be concerned primarily with music for instruments. Before the seventeenth century that had never happened.

Many of Frescobaldi’s compositions circulated during his lifetime only in manuscript, but the composer did personally oversee the publication of sixteen volumes between 1608 and 1637. Of the sixteen, only four volumes contained vocal compositions: one of motets, one of madrigals, and two of continuo arias written during a brief sojourn in Florence. The remaining twelve were devoted to instrumental works. Eight of them were issued in partitura, that is, laid out in score with strict voice leading, in most cases with parts provided so that they could be performed by ensembles as well as at the keyboard. The remaining four were libri d’intavolatura, idiomatic keyboard compositions laid out like modern keyboard music on a pair of staves corresponding to the player’s two hands, with free voice leading and other effects that precluded ensemble performance.

When he played them himself, the composer certainly adapted his ricercari, fantasias, and canzonas to the idiomatic style of his “intabulations.” Nevertheless, the libri d’intavolatura contained Frescobaldi’s most novel, most theatrical, and most elaborately “open-ended” compositions, and in that sense they reflected his most vividly over-the-top (i.e., “baroque”) side. Such compositions came in two main types—partite (that is, variations) over a ground bass, and formally capricious, unpredictable toccate. We will sample both at their most flamboyant.

A visiting French viol player named André Maugars left a revealing description of the mature Frescobaldi at work (or at play) in 1639, “displaying a thousand kinds of inventions on his harpsichord [spinettina] while the organ stuck to the main tune,” adding that “although his printed works give sufficient evidence of his skill, still, to get a true idea of his deep knowledge, one must hear him improvise toccatas full of admirable refinements and inventions.”1 Maugars well knew whereof he spoke. As an internationally famous musician from whom no written music survives, he if anyone knew that the musical daily business of seventeenth-century instrumentalists continued to be transacted ex tempore. On the same trip to Rome, Maugars enjoyed his own success before Pope Urban VIII, Frescobaldi’s patron, improvising in the organ loft during Mass on a theme presented as a challenge by the organist, who then repeated it as an accompaniment “while I varied it with so much imagination and with so many different rhythms and tempi that they were quite astonished.” Frescobaldi’s famous Cento partite sopra passacagli (“A Hundred Variations on Passacalles”), the concentrated residue of years of similar improvising, is nothing if not astonishing, with its frequent surprising forays into contrasting rhythms and tempi and its startling harmonic effects. It comes from the last of his keyboard publications, called Toccate d’intavolatura di cembalo et organo, partite di diverse arie, e correnti, balletti, ciaccone, passacagli, published in Rome in 1637. The title lists four other keyboard genres besides toccatas and partitas:

—The corrente was a dance in triple meter (courante in French) that could occur either with a quick step notated in or or in a more stately variant notated in with many hemiolas.

—The balletto, as Frescobaldi used the term, was a dignified dance of German origin (hence allemande in French), usually in a broad duple meter. Balletti and correnti were often cast in melodically related pairs, like the pavanes and galliards of the previous century.

—The ciaccona was a fast and furious dance in syncopated triple meter, which in the sixteenth century had been imported into Spanish and Italian courtly circles from the New World. (The first literary use of the word chacona, the Swiss music historian Lorenzo Bianconi has disclosed, came from a Spanish satire on Peruvian customs published in 1598.2) Its first appearance in a musical print was in an Italian guitar book of 1606, where it was given as a formula for singing poetry in the manner of an old-fashioned “aria.”3 As a dance, the ciaccona was built over repetitive chord progressions similar in practice to the traditional Italian dance tenors, and was considered so inveterately lascivious that it was banished—as an actual dance—from the Spanish stage. An air of forbidden fruit surrounded it thereafter, which is why it was the inevitable choice of Sacrati (or whoever it was who renovated L’incoronazione di Poppea) for the lubricious final duet. The Italian poet Giambattista Marino (1569–1625), whose highly mannered, flamboyant verses Monteverdi often set, aimed some mock curses at this “immodest, obscene dance, with its thousand twisted movements” in his epic Adonis: “Perish the foul inventor who first amongst us introduced this barbaric custom,…this impious profane game, which the novo ispano [i.e., the denizen of “New Spain,” meaning the Americas] calls ciaccona!”4 These lines were written in 1623. Nine years later, Monteverdi published his setting of Ottavio Rinuccini’s imitation of Petrarch’s famous sonnet Zefiro torna (“The breeze returns”) in the form of a “ciacona” (Ex. 2-1), and from then on it was a major Italian medium for love poetry, for stage music, and for instrumental virtuosity.

Passacagli is Italian for passacalles, a related Spanish genre consisting of variations on cadential patterns that apparently grew out of the habits of guitarists who accompanied courtly singers, and who introduced and bestrewed the songs with casual ritornellos—the kind of thing accompanists in today’s nonliterate (“pop”) genres call “vamping.” Like today’s popular guitarists and keyboardists, who often take off on their vamping figures for impressive flights of fancy, so the players of passacagli often elaborated them into long instrumental interludes, eventually into independent instrumental showpieces.

Chapter 2 Fat Times and Lean

ex. 2-1 Claudio Monteverdi, Zefiro torna, beginning

The repetitive cadential phrases of the ciaccona and the passacagli were a natural for adaptation to traditional ground-bass techniques, and that is how they entered the domain of written music. The first literate instrumental adaptations of the two related genres were by Frescobaldi. His second libro d’intavolatura, published in 1627, contained both a set of Partite sopra ciaccona (roughly “variations on the chacona”) and one of Partite sopra passacagli (“variations on passacalles”). Eventually the name of the latter variations genre was standardized in Italian as passacaglia, and the ciaccona, owing (as we shall see) to its many adaptations on the French stage, has become falsely but firmly identified with France and is now most widely known as the chaconne.

Frescobaldi’s enormous Cento partite (“hundred variations”) of 1637, though nominally another passacaglia set, actually mixes several of the genres just described. A total of 78 actual passacagli or varied two- or four-bar cadence figures alternate first with a corrente and then with some forty ciaccona progressions, producing a total far in excess of one hundred, from which the player was invited to choose ad libitum. As the composer wrote in the preface, “the passacaglias can be played separately, in accordance with what is most pleasing, by adjusting the tempo of one part to that of the other, and the same goes for the ciacconas.”5

It is even possible that the word cento in the title was chosen for its resonance with the earlier Latin usage, chiefly used in connection with church chant, which denotes not literally “one hundred” but rather a patchwork or mixture of formulas. The title, then, would mean something like “A mixed bag of variations on passacaglias [and other things]” or “Passacaglias mixed with other ground-bass formulas.” In any case, Frescobaldi’s fanciful mixture of sameness and contrast gave instrumental music access to a whole new temporal plane, and a newly dramatized character. This was music with real “content,” not just an accessory to vocal performances or a liturgical time-filler.

Yet tonally speaking, and in keeping with its character as compendium rather than a work of fixed content, Frescobaldi’s mixed bag is extremely, even disconcertingly, loose. The first set of passacagli, as well as the corrente that they surround, are in D minor. A sudden cadence to what we call the “relative major” on F, duly labeled “altro tono” (“the other mode”), leads to the first section labeled ciaccona, also in F. From there on the tonal behavior of the composition is altogether unpredictable, as is the final cadence on E. This lack of “tonal unity” has led some writers to suggest that the work is no “composition” at all, but just an assortment of goods. Other writers have even suggested that the components were printed in the wrong order as the result of “some sort of mishap at the printer’s office,” to cite one scholar’s particularly rash proposal.6 The composer’s presence on the scene, and his presumable role as proofreader, makes this somewhat implausible. While granting that the performer had many options besides the printed order (“in accordance with what is most pleasing,” as the composer allowed), the printed order must surely be counted as one of the available options. The only conclusion the evidence supports is that the “tonal unity” we look for now in an extended composition was not (yet) considered a necessary criterion of coherence for works of this type. Ex. 2-2 shows the final section, in E. Note the cadences in every other bar. Their regularity is in fact a guide to tempo; from their placement we can tell, for example, that the note values following the triple meter signature should be read at doppio movimiento or double speed.

Notes:

(1) Maugars’s whole letter, translated by Walter H. Bishop, may be found in Weiss and Taruskin, Music in the Western World: A History in Documents, 2nd ed., p. 165–68.

(2) Lorenzo Bianconi, Music in the Seventeenth Century, trans. David Bryant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), p. 101.

(3) Bianconi, Music in the Seventeenth Century, p. 103.

(4) Trans. by R. Taruskin from the Italian given in Bianconi, p. 102.

(5) Quoted in Richard Hudson, Passacaglio and Ciaconna from Guitar Music to Italian Keyboard Variations in the Seventeenth Century (Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press, 1981), p. 237.

(6) Hudson, Passacaglio and Ciaconna, p. 237.

Citation (MLA):
Richard Taruskin. "Chapter 2 Fat Times and Lean." The Oxford History of Western Music. Oxford University Press. New York, USA. n.d. Web. 11 Aug. 2020. <https://www.oxfordwesternmusic.com/view/Volume2/actrade-9780195384826-chapter-02.xml>.
Citation (APA):
Taruskin, R. (n.d.). Chapter 2 Fat Times and Lean. In Oxford University Press, Music In The Seventeenth And Eighteenth Centuries. New York, USA. Retrieved 11 Aug. 2020, from https://www.oxfordwesternmusic.com/view/Volume2/actrade-9780195384826-chapter-02.xml
Citation (Chicago):
Richard Taruskin. "Chapter 2 Fat Times and Lean." In Music In The Seventeenth And Eighteenth Centuries, Oxford University Press. (New York, USA, n.d.). Retrieved 11 Aug. 2020, from https://www.oxfordwesternmusic.com/view/Volume2/actrade-9780195384826-chapter-02.xml